Guidelines for the software review process

The main aim of the this stage is to understand and unclear the hidden requirements. It is always better to catch the ambiguities in requirement early in the SDLC. Cost of fixing the defects in early stage is lower than fixing defect in later stages.

It is most important to identify the ambiguities in the requirement before design specifications and project implementation phases of SDLC, hence this first stage is also known as Defect Prevention step. In this article we will discuss about detailed guidelines for Software Requirements Specification document reviews and checklist:.

In this article we have covered characteristics of requirement measurement. Here I am sum up the requirement testing in simple statement:. Make sure that any ambiguities in requirement should be identified early in the SDLC phase so it will reduce the cost to fixing the uncertainty in requirement. Is it a review for an investigation?

Is the case team reviewing for privilege? Is the case team preparing for depositions or preparing witnesses and experts? The overall end-goal for the document review being performed will determine the workflows legal teams will need to set up. In other words, how in-depth does the analysis of the data need to be for this particular matter? Will there be different review teams with different tasks?

The level of review required will determine how many reviewer groups and access permission levels there are to set up. Some options are as follows:. This requires planning by legal teams ahead of time. Custom fields specific to the matter and document review can be set up prior to starting review. These processes can take place prior or during a review depending on individual need. Some examples of things to consider for your workflow:.

Will the legal team need to share documents with co-counsel, experts, or consultants? If so, plan and have detailed discussions on what other parties are allowed to see, access and edit. External parties require stricter permissions, which must be managed properly.

Keep this in mind when determining appropriate levels of access to the work product of the other parties sharing the database. There are many advanced technologies available for document review. You should understand your technology options and their unique functionalities in order to determine which tool to implement. Some of these technologies to note are:. To make the testing process time and cost effective.

To make the final software with fewer defects. To eliminate the inadequacies. Process of Software Review:. Skip to content. Change Language. Related Articles. Next, a program design review is conducted with the programmers in order to get feedback before the design is implemented. Preliminary Design Review. During preliminary design review, the high-level architectural design is reviewed to determine whether the design meets all the stated requirements as well as the non-functional requirements.

This review is conducted to serve the following purposes. In this review, it is verified that the proposed design includes the required hardware and interfaces with the other parts of the computer -based system.

To conduct a preliminary design review, a review team is formed where each member acts as an independent person authorized to make necessary comments and decisions.

This review team comprises the following individuals. If errors are noted in the review process then the faults are assessed on the basis of their severity. That is, if there is a minor fault it is resolved by the review team. However, if there is a major fault, the review team may agree to revise the proposed conceptual design.